Important Truths About the Bible,

Part 1: How Do We Know the Bible Is the Word of God?

-Sam A. Smith

 

Have you ever been asked, or have you ever asked yourself, “What’s so special about the Bible?” It’s an interesting question, with an amazing answer! You see the Bible is a totally unique bookeven though it’s not uncommon to find religious writers, even theologians, who minimize the uniqueness of the Bible by placing it on an equal plane with the literature of other religions. So, is the Bible just another “holy” book? Well…let’s take a look and see!

 

There are essentially five major groups of religious writings outside the Biblethe Veda (of Brahmanism), the Tripitaka (of Buddhism), the Zend-Avesta (of Zoroastrianism), the writings of Confucianism (actually a philosophy), and the Koran (of Islam). While there are other ancient writings that date from before the composition of the Bible, the Bible claims to contain a comprehensive record of God’s dealing with man from man’s creationa record assumed to be passed down from one generation to the next in oral tradition, perhaps along with written material long lost in antiquity. If the message of the Bible is taken at face value, though its composition may not be the oldest of human writings, its truth antedates all other religions, since its story begins with the creation of the world.

 

The question “Is the Bible true,” is certainly the most important question anyone could ever ask. If the Bible is true we are in the midst of a gigantic cosmic struggle between light and darkness, good and evil, and the outcome, both cosmic and personal defines our future. Many, perhaps most people today dismiss the Bible as just another collection of religious myths, stories, quasi-history, and religious doctrine; most of which was written by well-meaning, but basically naive people who didn’t have the capacity, means, or motivation to see that their religious beliefs were simply superstition. After all, we have so many contradictory religious writings that most of them can’t be true anyway. What makes the Bible any different? For the answer to this question we have to look at the Bible from many different angles. For instance, it’s critically important to know whether or not the Bible is true historically. If it isn’t correct on basic historical fact and geography, there’s not much reason to believe that it’s correct on anything else. Secondly, we need to know if the Bible’s message makes good common sense; anything that violates our common sense isn’t likely to be taken seriously. Third, we need to know whether the supernatural element in the Bible is really believable, and whether it can be verified. Fourth, we need some means of determining whether or not the religious truth taught in the Bible is really “true.” This is, of course, a “tall order” for one very simple reason: There is no way to verify the supernatural from within the natural realm. If we try to use such a methodology we will inevitably fail, but this problem is anticipated in the Bible itself. Although it is not possible to test the supernatural from within the natural realm, it is possible for the supernatural to manifest itself within the natural realm. The real question we must ask then is this, “Is there anything in the Bible that evidences the existence of the supernatural?”

 

Let’s begin by making some basic observations about the Bible. First, the Bible is the only book that presents a comprehensive and connected history of man’s spiritual condition and needs from the time of his creation to eternity. Second, the Bible is the only book to present a comprehensive picture on the nature and purpose of God and his plan for mankind, and the physical universe. Third, the Bible is the only book that provides clear and consistent evidence of its supernatural origin through the record of fulfilled prophecy. Fourth, the Bible is the only ancient book that consistently proves to be the product of a superior (supernormal) intelligence, based on its statements about the physical universe. Fifth, the Bible, though written over fifteen centuries by more than forty different authors exhibits a singularity of purpose, morality, message, and theology. Features like “types” (a sort of prophetic analogy) demonstrate the interconnectedness of the Bible’s message across many centuries. (“Types” are Old Testament people, events, or objects that were clearly intended to prefigure some New Testament person, event, or truthfor example; the Old Testament sacrifices are a typical prefigurement of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.)

 

Not only is the Bible itself unique, its message is unique too. That’s not to say that no other religious documents say any of these things, but only the Bible says them all. Here are some of the fundamental themes that permeate the Bible.  1) There is one true God (though existing as three persons). 2) The universe is not eternalGod created it out of nothing. (It’s interesting that modern science has just, within the last sixty years, “discovered” the truth that the universe indeed had a beginning. We now know the universe is expanding in all directions at an incredible pace. If we could simply play the universe’s history in reverse, we would see it shrink into an infinitesimal point and vanish!) 3) God is transcendent, that is, he exists apart from creation, and creation is not part of himas is intrinsic in pantheism and found in all polytheism. It is interesting that many present-day theoretical cosmologists are forced to admit that only something, or should we say “someone,” infinitely intelligent and completely outside of the universe, could be the ultimate cause of the universe. Most religions in history have overlooked this simple necessity of ultimate logical causality and thus proven themselves to be logically deficient. No religion that is wrong about man’s ultimate origin can be right about his present spiritual need, or his future. While modern science has only recently admitted this transcendent causal necessity, it was the very first fact recorded in the Bible (Genesis 1:1), and distinctively reaffirmed in the New Testament as the very cornerstone of belief concerning Christ’s qualifications as Savior; for if man needs saving, only his transcendent Creator could save him (John 1:1-5; Colossian 1:16-17). While the Koran accepts the concept of a transcendent God, that idea was recorded in the Old Testament almost two thousand years before the Koran was written, and the idea was most assuredly borrowed from the Hebrew Scriptures. 4) God is perfect in every respect, and His creation was originally made perfect. 5) Man was originally given a free will to choose good or evil. 6) Man did evil, by disobeying his Creator and became sinful in both his nature and choices. In this state man is “lost,” separated from God and unable to remedy his fallen situation by his own power. In man’s spiritually dead state, his will is in bondage to sin, and he cannot please God. 7) Man’s sin is passed down from one generation to the next so that all who are born through natural generation are born in this ruined state. 8) God, from eternity, knowing of man’s choice, set a plan in motion to redeem His creation. 9) For thousands of years God prepared man so His plan could be brought about. Through prophecies, types (prophetic analogies) and pronouncements, God prepared man for His saving work on the cross. During this time He revealed Himself and His plan in many ways. 10) When the time was right, God sent His only Son into the world to offer Him as a sacrifice so that sinful men could be brought back to God. In fact, God’s plan calls for more than just reconciliationit calls for adoption, in which those reconciled actually become members of God’s family. 11) God will someday send His Son, Jesus Christ, to bring to a close the present era and reconcile all things to Himself through the completion of redemption, for the “saved,” and judgment for the rest.

 

How can we be certain the Bible is what it claims to be—i.e., divinely inspired truth?

If the Bible isn’t true, it probably doesn’t matter where it came from, or what translation one uses, or how much one gets from it. That means the question of truthfulness is a fundamental issue; everything else depends on that. When we ask people who believe the Bible to be true how they know it’s true, we get a variety of answers. For example, it’s not uncommon to hear the following responses. “My Sunday school teacher (or pastor) told me the Bible is true.” Good for your Sunday school teacher (or pastor)! But did he tell you “how” he knows the Bible is true, or did you simply accept his opinion uncritically? Another response is: “The Bible says its true.” OK, but unless you already knew it was true, you couldn’t trust what it says about itselfright? So, how did you know it was true, so you knew you could trust it when it said it was true? [This is like the following riddle: Statement #1: The next statement is true.” Statement #2: “The previous statement is false.” Question: Is the second statement true or false? This riddle is guaranteed to give you a headache!  But, it does illustrate the problem of circular reasoninga common logical flaw.] Unfortunately, if we say the Bible is true simply because it “says so,” that’s also circular reasoning. (While the Bible’s claim to be true isn’t “proof” that it is true, it is none-the-less an important claim because it forces us ask the question: “Is such a claim reasonable?”) Another response is: “The Bible can be proven to be true historically.” It’s true that historical research in many instances confirms the accuracy of the Bible, but can we conclude that the Bible is accurate in spiritual matters simply because it is historically accurate? Aren’t there some secular books that are historically accurate, but which might not be reliable in spiritual matters? Another response is: “The Bible has been shown to be scientifically accurate.” Thats true, and its probably much more significant than historical accuracythough both are important. The reason scientific accuracy is so significant is that it reveals a state of knowledge that could not have been obtained through any ordinary means of discovery available at the time the Bible was written. In other words, if the Bible was written with scientific accuracy thousands of years ago, that would imply some knowledge was communicated to the biblical writers by someone who knew the truth about the way the universe operates. So, couldn’t that someone be God? Yesit could! But it could also have come from any sufficiently knowledgeable being. At this point you probably want to say, “But there were no other sufficiently knowledgeable beings around from whom man could have gotten such information,” but you couldn’t prove that. Another response is: “The Bible accurately predicts the future; since only God knows the future, this attests to his authorship of the Bible.” If you’re looking for material proof of divine revelation, this one is about as good as it gets. We can definitely prove that details about future events were revealed in Scripture with remarkable (100%) accuracy. In order for this to have happened, the biblical writers had to obtain this information from somewhere. Unfortunately, Satan has done his homework to spawn confusion. He has been working on two frontsscience fiction, and literary criticism. Through science fiction he has convinced many people that somehow it might actually be possible to obtain detailed information about the future through purely natural means (such as time-travel); and through biblical literary criticism he has convinced others that much of what we call “predictive prophecy” was actually written after the fact (i.e., after the events actually happened. (This is called “post-dating.”) [Note: Almost all of the major predictive prophecies of the Bible can be dated from before the events they predicted took place. For example, in Isaiah 52-53 the prophet made over twenty highly specific prophecies concerning the details of the death of Christ. Most of these details could not have been “self-fulfilled” by Christ since they were initiated and controlled by others who had no knowledge that his death was to be the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, and it is clear that Isaiah’s prophecy was written hundreds of years prior to Christ’s birth. In the collection of Dead Sea manuscripts there is a copy that is almost two hundred years older than Christ, and that is only a copy of much older manuscripts. (Isaiah is believed to date from the eight century B.C..) Actually, there is no evidence that any biblical prophecies were written after the prophesied events occurredmuch less, all of them.

 

Do you see a pattern developing? No matter what line of reasoning one projects, there’s always a counter argument. At best, logical arguments aimed at proving the Bible to be true have only limited usefulness. Perhaps God has a better way for us to know the Bible is true.

 

So, we ask the question again, "How can we know the Bible is true?"

As we said, the Bible is historically and scientifically accurate. It’s also true that the Bible records the future with amazing (100%) accuracy. These are things we would expect if God is the ultimate source of the Bible. But we must not confuse “characteristics” with “proof.” While these characteristics are consistent with divine authorship, they would only serve as proof in a world ruled by reality and perfect intellectual honesty. We do not live in such a world, but God has given us a way to know that his Word is true.

 

Ultimately we know the Bible is true because as the Word of God it is a self-authenticating message. What does “self-authenticating” mean? It means that when God speaks, those to whom He is speaking will recognize His words as coming from Him. Think of it this way. If you use the Internet for business, you can sign a contract electronically with what is called a “digital signature.” That digital signature contains authenticating information to verify to the one receiving it that the signature is authentic. God, by analogy, does something similar. Jesus said in John 10:27, “My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me.” Have you noticed in your reading of the Bible that whenever God spoke to people, they seemed to recognize who was speaking?

 

God’s communication to man is self-authenticating, meaning that it doesn’t need any logical proofs. However, observational evidence such as mentioned above can be useful in combating false allegations about the Bible (i.e., that it is unreliable historically or scientifically, or that it is no different from any other religious book). God authenticates His own Word to us, and because of that we can spend less time defending it, and more time using it. Hebrews 4:12-13 says, 

 

“For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.” [NIV]

 

God authenticates His Word to those to whom He desires to speak; for the rest, probably no amount of evidence would ever be enough!

 

 

Copyright 2005, The Biblical Reader / Sam A. Smith