Copyright
2001, by Sam A. Smith
Published
in The Biblical and Theological Reader
Available
online at http://btr.biblicalreader.com
Sam A. Smith
The
kingdom of God is one of the central themes of the Bible; some students of the
Word view it as “the” central theme. In many ways the Bible relates to us that
God is the sovereign Lord of creation, though the expression of that kingdom,
at least from the human perspective, may take different forms.
At least three distinct aspects of the kingdom of God are alluded to in Scripture, the universal kingdom, the visible kingdom, and the invisible kingdom. While our present topic is the visible kingdom, and particularly its millennial phase, it would be helpful to survey all three aspects before proceeding.
The Universal
Kingdom of God
God’s
sovereignty over all creation is often referred to as his “universal kingdom.”
This concept appears early in Israel’s history and is a frequent theme in the
Psalms (cf. 10:16; 29:10; 103:19-22; 145:10-13). The universal kingdom
of God encompasses all creation, and therefore includes even the ungodly, for
they too are under the sovereign rule of God.
The
Visible Kingdom of God
To the
Jewish mind, in the Old Testament, the kingdom of God was equated with God’s
theocratic rule over the Nation of Israel. Ultimately this rule was to have
its fullest expression in the rule of God through his Messiah, at which time
Israel would be vindicated and led to victory over her enemies, and experience
the joy of profuse divine blessing and peace.
Only in
the New Testament does the millennial conception of the kingdom of God come
into sharp focus, in contrast to the Old Testament, which made no distinction
between the Millennium and eternity. With the recording of the Book of
Revelation, it became apparent than the earthly kingdom rule would occur in two
phases (see below). The first phase is to occur in the Millennium (Rev.
20:4-10), which as the name suggests, encompasses the first one thousand years
of the visible kingdom (approximately). The second phase of the visible earthly
rule of God occurs in eternity with the creation of a new heavens and earth,
and the New Jerusalem, the home of the saints, resting upon the new earth (Rev.
21:1-22:5).

The
invisible kingdom of God refers to God’s rule in the hearts of those yielded to
him, and thus is a present reality. This aspect of the kingdom is largely
developed in the gospels (cf. Matt. 6:33; 18:1-4; Mk. 9:1; Lk: 17:20-24;
Jn. 18:36), but can be found elsewhere in the New Testament (cf. Col.
1:13). The kingdom of heaven, discussed extensively in Matthew, should not be
confused with the invisible kingdom of God. While the invisible kingdom of God
includes only the truly saved, the kingdom of heaven encompasses all who
outwardly profess faith in Christ. The parables of Matthew 13 indicate that, as
the present age progresses, the kingdom of heaven will be corrupted by the
presence of the unregenerate. The kingdom of heaven then is a visible
manifestation of the invisible kingdom of God, along with many who profess
faith in Christ but are not truly saved. The visible church, which includes
both saved and lost, is, at the present time, representative of the kingdom of
heaven, but strictly speaking the two cannot be equated since the kingdom of
heaven extends beyond the Church-age.
The Old
Testament concept of an earthly kingdom emerges first from the Abrahamic
Covenant, and is then expanded upon in the Palestinian, Davidic, and New
Covenants. These four covenants shape the Old Testament idea of the visible
kingdom of God (which, as we will see, is inseparably tied to the nation of
Israel). A simple analogy may help to illustrate the relationship of these
covenant promises to other Old Testament prophecies concerning the kingdom. If
we think of the covenants (the Abrahamic, Palestinian, Davidic, and New
Covenants) as the bold lines of a coloring book–determining the shape of the
picture–then we could also think of other prophecies as the colors applied
within those lines. The covenant promises form the outline of God’s plan for
Israel. Other millennial prophecies supply additional details that must be
understood within the framework of the covenant promises. Since these
covenants define the kingdom program for Israel, in studying the Millennium it
is important to begin with a thorough examination of the covenants before
proceeding to other prophetic passages.
The Abrahamic
Covenant is mentioned in Genesis 12:1-3, 6-7; 13:14-17; 15:1-21; 17:1-14 and
22:15-18. In these passages, God makes the following promises to Abraham
personally. 1) His name will be great (12:2). 2) He will be the
father of many nations (17:5). 3) His descendants will be innumerable
(13:16; 15:5; 22:17). 4) Kings will come from him (17:6). 5) God will
be his God (17:7). 6) The one who blesses Abraham will be blessed, and the
one who curses Abraham will be cursed (12:3). 7) The covenant is to be a perpetual
(eternal) covenant (17:7).
In
addition to the personal promises made to Abraham, God also made the following
promises to his descendants. 1) They will become a great nation (12:2).
2) They will, at some time, come to possess the promised land forever
(17:8). 3) God will be their God (17:8). 4) They will be victorious
over their enemies (22:17). 5) God’s covenant will be established with
them forever (17:7). The covenant also includes a blessing for the Gentiles,
that they would, in some yet unspecified way, be blessed (12:3; 22:18).
The
Abrahamic Covenant expressly promises that Abraham’s descendants will come to
possess the land and that they will live in that land as recipients of divine
favor forever. That these promises have never been invalidated is a point that
will be considered later; first the relationship that exists between the
Abrahamic, Palestinian, Davidic, and New Covenants will be explored.
The
Palestinian Covenant, so called because it was made with Israel upon their
entrance into the Promised Land, is recorded in Deuteronomy 29:1-30:20. Moses
indicates its connection to the Abrahamic Covenant when he said:
[Deut. 29:12-13] “You are standing here in order to enter into a covenant with the LORD your God, a covenant the LORD is making with you this day and sealing with an oath, to confirm you this day as his people, that he may be your God as he promised you and as he swore to your fathers, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.” [Italics added for emphasis.]
What God
swore to Abraham, in the Abrahamic Covenant, he was prepared to implement as
the people of Israel stood on the verge of their entrance into the land. This
covenant seems to have two purposes: 1) to ensure that the people
understood their inheritance of the land was the direct result of the promises
previously made to Abraham (29:12-13); and 2) to clarify for the people
the conditions under which they could expect to enter into the enjoyment of
this promise–the condition being their continued subjection to him (29:16-29).
One of the most interesting features of this covenant is found in 30:1-10, for
there God indicates that they would rebel in the future and their rebellion
would cost them the enjoyment of this covenant blessing, such that they would be
dispersed from the land, but the covenant itself would not be invalidated.
Rather, the blessing would be reserved for a generation that will call upon him
and to which he will respond by bringing them back into the land. The
Palestinian Covenant then, is an amplification of the land promises previously
made under the Abrahamic Covenant, and its perpetual validity is apparent from
the language of the covenant itself. It reinforces the promise made to Abraham
that his descendants would someday come to possess the Promised Land forever.
The
Davidic Covenant is recorded in 2 Samuel 7:12-17. It has four main
provisions. 1) David will have a son who will build the house of the LORD
(v. 13), which was fulfilled in Solomon. 2) While God would correct
David’s son, he would never take the throne from him (vv. 14-15).
3) God promised that David’s house (his lineage) would endure forever
(v. 16). 4) God also promised that the right to the throne of Israel
would forever remain with the house of David (v. 16).
While the
text itself does not make reference to the Abrahamic Covenant, the connection
is apparent since the people which David’s line will perpetually have the right
to rule are the people of promise under the Abrahamic Covenant. The prophet
Jeremiah later demonstrated a connection between these two covenants when he
uttered the following prophecy:
[Jer. 33:25-26] “. . . This is what the LORD says: ‘If I have not established my covenant with day and night and the fixed laws of heaven and earth, then I will reject the descendants of Jacob and David my servant and will not choose one of his sons to rule over the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. For I will restore their fortunes and have compassion on them.’”
The Davidic
Covenant expands upon the national aspect of the Abrahamic Covenant by specifying
that the right to the throne of Israel is to remain with David’s line.
The prophecy of the New Covenant is found in
Jeremiah 31:31-34. Through this prophecy, God promised that he would someday
establish a New Covenant with Israel, a covenant by which he will write his
laws on their hearts (v. 33), probably a reference to the giving of the
Spirit, indicative of regeneration. The result will be that all Israel will
know the LORD (v. 34). While the implementation of this covenant is
dependent upon the work of Christ upon the cross, that work does not, in
itself, fulfill this promise, for it has not yet resulted in the salvation of
Israel as a nation. We must conclude, therefore, that the New Covenant is yet
to be fulfilled. The New Covenant essentially reveals the nature of the
special relationship that Israel is to have with God as a result of the
fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant. Of course, this does not leave Gentiles
out of the picture, since they too are blessed under the Abrahamic Covenant
(Gen. 12:3; 22:18).
It is
important to recognize that the Abrahamic Covenant, as well as the other three related
covenants, are unconditional in nature. This does not mean that there are no
conditions that must be met in order for them to be fulfilled, for in that
sense, there is a condition–genuine faith. Rather, the unconditional nature of
these covenants refers to the fact that Israel’s disobedience both past and
present, has not, indeed cannot, invalidate these covenants, because their
continuance was never linked to Israel’s response to God. Though generations of
Abraham’s descendants have turned from him, yet God maintains his covenanted
promises, ready to fulfill them to that elect generation who will, in the
future, turn to their rightful Messiah–Jesus Christ.
When the
unconditional nature of these covenants is understood, it becomes apparent that
whatever limited benefits Israel may have enjoyed historically as a result of
these covenants, in no sense can it be said that they have been fulfilled. The
position of covenant theology, which generally sees no place for the
fulfillment of these covenants in the future, is that their fulfillment, as
with all the covenants, was conditioned upon Israel’s faith, and since Israel
broke faith with God (manifested ultimately in the rejection of her Messiah),
these covenants have been invalidated.
There are
three reasons for believing that God has not abandoned his covenant made with
Abraham.
1)
The form of the covenant given in Genesis 15:9-21 is that of an
unconditional covenant, in which all of the responsibility for the fulfillment
rests with God. The scene in Genesis 15:1-21, in which Abraham divided various
animals, and God–depicted by a great smoking furnace–passed between the
divided pieces, is a picture of the sealing of the covenant, somewhat
equivalent to the signing of a modern treaty. The fact that only God passed
between the divided pieces is significant. Normally, in this type of covenant,
known as a suzerainty-vassal treaty, both parties would pass between the pieces
together, thus indicating their mutual obligation to keep the conditions of the
covenant, lest they bring upon themselves a curse and become like the slain
animals. That God alone passed between the pieces is indicative that the
covenant obligations rest solely upon him. In other words, it was not up to
Abraham or his descendants to do anything to validate this covenant. Of course,
no individual, nor the nation as a whole, could enter into the blessings of the
covenant apart from faith (Gen. 17:13-14). Nevertheless, faithlessness on the
part of an individual or an entire generation of individuals would not
invalidate the covenant itself; it merely excluded that individual, or
generation, from the covenant blessings. In other words, the validity of the
covenant and the enjoyment of it by a specific set of people are two entirely distinct
issues. God rejected those who rejected the covenant relationship. If a
generation arises which will accept the covenant relationship, they will have
the covenant fulfilled to them. Since the promises were made concerning a
people, they will be fulfilled when an elect generation of Jews turns to God
through acceptance of their Messiah.
2) Even though Abraham’s descendants were disobedient and fell into idolatry, subsequent statements made in the Scripture indicate that their disobedience had not invalidated the covenant. For example, the Abrahamic Covenant is invoked in 1 Chronicles 16:16-18, a thousand years after it was made with Abraham. During much of that time, Israel had lived in idolatry, yet the covenant itself was not invalidated. The psalmist in Psalm 105:1-11 says,
“He remembers his covenant forever, the word he commanded, for a
thousand generations, the covenant he made with Abraham, the oath he swore to
Isaac. He confirmed it to Jacob as a decree, to Israel as an everlasting
covenant: ‘To you I will give the land of Canaan as the portion you will
inherit.’”
If disobedience and lack of faith could invalidate the Abrahamic Covenant, it surely would not have survived the first one thousand years of Israel’s history.
3) The subsequent Palestinian, Davidic and New Covenants are also indicated as being unconditional, eternal covenants. When seen in light of their connection to the Abrahamic Covenant, it becomes clear that they all must share the same unconditional quality. Concerning the unconditional nature of the Davidic Covenant, God–through the psalmist–in Psalm 89 says:
[vv. 28-37]
“I will maintain my love to him forever, and my covenant with him will never
fail. I will establish his line forever, his throne as long as the heavens
endure. If his sons forsake my law and do not follow my statutes, if they
violate my decrees and fail to keep my commands, I will punish their sin with
the rod, their iniquity with flogging; but I will not take my love from him,
nor will I ever betray my faithfulness. I will not violate my covenant or alter
what my lips have uttered. Once for all, I have sworn by my holiness–and I will
not lie to David–that his line will continue forever anf his throne endure
before me like the sun; it will be established forever like the moon, the
faithful witness in the sky.”
Almost
four hundred years later, on the eve of Israel’s expulsion from the land
because of rampant idolatry, God spoke these words through the prophet
Jeremiah:
[Jer. 33:20-22]
“This is what the LORD says: ‘If you can break my covenant with the day and my
covenant with the night, so that day and night no longer come at their
appointed time, then my covenant with David my servant–and my covenant with the
Levites who are priests ministering before me–can be broken and David will no
longer have a descendant to reign on his throne. I will make the descendants
of David my servant and the Levites who minister before me as countless as the
stars of the sky and as measureless as the sand on the seashore.’”
Both the
nature of these covenants and subsequent biblical statements reflecting back on
them indicate that they were made unconditionally–meaning that they have not
been invalidated by Israel’s past unbelief–and that God intends to see them
fulfilled through his sovereign election of a future generation (Jer.
31:31-37).
Implications
of the Abrahamic, Palestinian, Davidic, and New Covenants
When taken
as a whole, the end-time implications of these covenants are as follows. The
Abrahamic Covenant, which promises the descendants of Abraham a land forever,
has neither been invalidated nor fulfilled. Unless God intends to renege on his
promises, the fulfillment must be a future reality. The connection between the
Abrahamic Covenant and the subsequent prophetic descriptions of such a kingdom
(e.g., Isa. 11:4-10; 35:5-10; 60:1-22; 65:17-25; Ezek. 34:25-31; Joel
2:21-27; 3:18-21) leaves no doubt that the Abrahamic Covenant is the basis of
the kingdom promises for Israel.
The Palestinian Covenant repeats the land provisions of the Abrahamic Covenant and further expands upon the provisions for Israel’s enjoyment of this promise–which is faithfulness to the LORD. In this covenant, God foresaw Israel’s disobedience and dispersion (Deut. 30:1-8) and promised their restoration upon return to him. Of course, Israel’s ultimate return to the LORD can only occur as a result of inward spiritual conversion.
The
Davidic Covenant is an expansion upon the national aspect of the Abrahamic
Covenant, in that it specifies that David’s house is to have a perpetual right
to the throne of Israel. The promise requires that when the kingdom prophecies
are fulfilled, a member of David’s house must rule over Israel. This will
ultimately be fulfilled in the person of David’s son, Israel’s Messiah (Isa.
9:6-7).
The
prophecy of the coming New Covenant specifies how God intends to bring about
the implementation of the Abrahamic Covenant. The blessings, which God
promised to Abraham, can only be brought about by genuine spiritual renewal on
the part of Abraham’s descendants. It would be nonsense to suppose that a
non-elect, unregenerate people could live in a state of perpetual blessing and
special divine relationship as envisioned in the Abrahamic Covenant. Thus,
before God can fulfill his promises to Abraham, he must first raise up an elect
generation of Jews who will respond to his offer of salvation and thus enter
into the blessings of the covenant. It is important to recognize that election
is at the heart of Israel’s conversion, for if salvation ultimately depended
upon man, the fulfillment of these promises could never be anything more than a
remote prospect. Yet, God intends by his sovereign choice, to bring spiritual
life to Israel so that his covenanted promises can be infallibly brought to
pass.
In
summarizing the implications of these four covenants, we note that God intends
to regather Abraham’s children, to breathe within them spiritual life, to plant
them securely in their land, with David’s Son, their Messiah, ruling over them
forever. The implementation of this program will necessitate a full regathering
of Israel early in the millennial period (Isa. 11:12; 49:8-26; 66:1-20; Amos
9:11-15; Zech. 8:1-23).
Naturally,
since the promises made in the Abrahamic Covenant, and subsequently confirmed
to Israel and expanded upon in the Palestinian, Davidic, and New Covenants are
eternal, they cannot be fulfilled in any finite period of time. The visible
kingdom, envisioned in Old Testament prophecy, is an eternal kingdom. As stated
previously, it is only in the New Testament we learn this kingdom is to be
manifested in two phases: the first phase, generally referred to as the
Millennium, involves the first one-thousand years (approximately) of the
kingdom which will take place on the present earth (Rev. 20:4-7). The second, final phase of the kingdom will
be manifested in the new heavens and earth (Rev. 21:1-22:5). Because the
characteristics of these two phases differ significantly, they are generally
treated separately as the Millennium, and eternity (see Figure 5.2). Only the
millennial phase of the visible kingdom will be discussed here.
The millennial kingdom is a future reality. This is apparent from two simple observations: 1) the promises and prophecies concerning the Millennium have never been fulfilled, and 2) Scripture indicates that the Millennium will be inaugurated shortly after the second coming of Christ (Zech. 14:1-9; Rev. 19:11-20:6). Although it is only a hint, Daniel 12:11-12 indicates the possibility that the resurrection associated with the beginning of the Millennium will occur as much as forty-five days after the end of the Tribulation period.
The
Millennium kingdom will be global; however, Israel–and Jerusalem in
particular–will be the center of attention during the period, for it is from there
that Messiah will reign (Isa. 2:1-4), and Israel will occupy a special place of
honor at the head of the nations (Isa. 60:1-22; 61:4-9; 62:1-12; Jer. 16:14-18;
30:18-22; Mic. 4:1-2; Zeph. 3:20).
As the
name suggests, the Millennium lasts approximately one thousand years (Rev.
20:2,3,4,6,7). Satan’s confinement, which begins before the inception of the
Millennium, is to last for one thousand years, after which he will be released.
Satan’s release will result in a final rebellion and the deaths of those who
follow him (Rev. 20:7-10). The amount of time which lapses between Satan’s
release and the final rebellion is not stated in Scripture; therefore, it is
not possible to give a precise figure for the duration of the period. The
destruction of the rebellious marks the end of the Millennium.
Humanly, the
Millennium will be a period characterized by health, prosperity, satisfaction,
and longevity (Isa. 65:18-25, cf.
35:3-7). Only regenerate people will enter the kingdom from the Tribulation
(Matt. 25:31-46). They will be joined by the glorified Church-age saints
(having been removed from the earth prior to the commencement of the
Tribulation), as well as the resurrected Tribulation saints who did not
survive to the second coming, and the resurrected Old Testament saints. Of
these four groups, only the saints who survived the Tribulation will be in
their natural bodies. While the Scripture does not explicitly address the
question of whether these saints living in their natural bodies will be subject
to death, there is reason to believe they will survive the entire period, since
the resurrection of the righteous occurs at the beginning of the Millennium and
there is no mention of any subsequent resurrection of righteous dead. If this
hypothesis is true, then only the unsaved will die during the Millennium. The
unsaved are, naturally, the descendants of believers who came into the
Millennium in their natural bodies. Still, even though subject to death, they
will live much longer lives than is presently possible (Isa. 65:20-22). As the
period progresses, the population of unsaved people will swell to enormous
proportions, possibly far exceeding the population of the saints (Rev. 20:7-9).
Some additional elements of human life included in the Millennium will be
worship (Zech. 14:16), labor (Isa. 65:21-23), healing and wholeness–both
physical and emotional (Isa. 35:3-7; Isa. 25:6-9).
Governmentally, the
Millennium will be a theocratic kingdom with Christ ruling the world from
Jerusalem, which will serve as both the religious and political capital of the
world (cf. Isa. 9:6; Rev. 20:6).
However, each nation will continue to have a significant measure of freedom in
governing itself (Isa. 2:2-5). Apparently some laws will be uniform, since they
will originate from Zion. The presence of people in their unglorified state,
including an increasing number of unregenerate people, especially toward the
end of the period, will naturally result in problems. Disputes between nations
will still occur, but perhaps with less frequency and certainly with less
intensity, since Christ will be present to mediate. Apparently, it will be
necessary on occasion for Christ to remind some of the nations of their dependence
upon him (both spiritual and political) by depriving them of blessings, such as
rain, for failure to fulfill their obligation of worship (Zech. 14:16-19).
Economically, the
Millennium will represent a time of unparalleled prosperity (Joel 2:21-27; Amos
9:13-15). The amelioration of the effects of the Edenic curse upon the earth (cf.
Isa. 11:6-9; Rom. 8:18-24) will undoubtedly account for much of this
prosperity. However, the presence of Christ and the influence of godliness in
business, government, social institutions, and the sciences will certainly have
an effect, not to mention the positive economic impact brought about by the
elimination of war and the lack of need for maintaining standing armies (Isa.
2:4).
Socially, the
Millennium will be characterized as a time of unprecedented peace, world
harmony, and justice (Isa. 9:1-7). The presence of Christ and the absence of
Satan’s influence, at least until the end of the period, will affect the world
in such a positive way that even with an ever increasing population of
unredeemed people, the world will experience unparalleled harmony both in the
natural and human realms, not seen since before the fall of man. At the present
time, the ways of the world dominate society; in the Millennium, the knowledge
of the LORD and his ways will be the predominant influence (Isa. 9:11; 54:13;
Hab. 2:4).
Religiously, the
peoples of the earth will worship the true God. In Ezekiel 40-48, Ezekiel
records what must certainly be the plan for the Millennial Temple. Isaiah also
mentions the Millennial Temple (Isa. 2:3; 60:13), and adds that burnt
sacrifices will be offered (Isa. 56:6-7; 60:7). Jeremiah echoed the same
thought when he prophesied that the Levitical priests would never fail to have
a man to stand before God continually “to offer burnt offerings and to present
sacrifices” (Jer. 33:18). Zechariah, while not making explicit reference to the
Temple, did indicate that all the peoples of the earth will be represented at
the celebration of the Feast of Tabernacles, on pain of divine displeasure.
Although worship will be quite natural for the saved who enter the period, as
time progresses and the population of the unsaved increases, there will
apparently be increased reluctance to render worship to God (Zech. 14:16-19).
The idea that there are to be animal sacrifices in the Millennium (Jer. 33:18)
has proved to be problematic for some who perceive this as a reversion to the
Old Testament law. However, when the true historical significance of the
biblical sacrifices is understood, as pointing to Christ’s sacrifice, their use
in millennial worship is easily understood, as a memorial to Christ’s work upon
the cross rather than an addition to it. As such, the sacrifices do not
indicate a return to an earlier economy (the law), rather they function as a
remembrance–much like the Church’s present celebration of the Lord’s Supper.
As stated,
the duration of the period is slightly in excess of one thousand years;
however, it is not possible to give a precise figure since the length of the
interval between the release of Satan and the end of the period is not known.
While many
of the more general features of the Millennium are described in Scripture, very
little is known of actual events. In fact, only three events are mentioned: the
resurrection of the righteous at the beginning of the period, the release of
Satan (and presumably his host) after one-thousand years, and the final
rebellion which marks the conclusion of the period. The judgment of the nations
(Matt. 25:31-46, cf. 7:21-23; Lk.
13:22-28), though not strictly a millennial event, will take place during the
short interval between the second coming and the beginning of the Millennium.
At this judgment, Christ will determine who, by virtue of redemption, will be
allowed to enter his kingdom.
The
judgment of the nations apparently occurs during the forty-five (or
seventy-five) day interlude between the Tribulation and the Millennium (cf.
Dan. 12:11-12; Matt. 25:31-46). Since only the redeemed may enter the kingdom,
the purpose of this judgment is to exclude the unredeemed, who will be
consigned to Hades, until their final judgment. How Christ will judge so many
in so short a period is not known. Since the righteous and the unrighteous will
be separated from one another by the angels at the second coming (Matt. 13:29 cf.
v. 40, 47-49; 24:31), it is possible that this is a summary judgment
wherein the righteous and unrighteous are dealt with as groups. If this is the
case, and there is strong reason to believe it is, then it stands in contrast
to the final judgment of the lost, after the Millennium, in which everyone’s
works will be examined individually. In any case, only the righteous will be
allowed to enter the kingdom.
Daniel 12:11-12 indicates that those who survive forty-five days after the close of the Tribulation period are “blessed.” It is possible that the reason for this statement is that the resurrection occurs on the forty-fifth day and thus those survivors will have escaped physical death forever. (An alternate explanation for the statement in Daniel is that if one survives to the forty-fifth day beyond the close of the Tribulation, he has successfully passed through the judgment of the nations and is thus assured of a place in the kingdom.) Whether the resurrection occurs precisely on the forty-fifth day from the second coming or merely close thereto, the occasion seems to signal the beginning of the millennial reign (Rev. 20:4).
After the resurrection of the righteous dead, we have no mention of specific events until the release of Satan after his one thousand years of confinement. We know only that the saints will rule with Christ during this period (Rev. 20:4-5), and we know the general characteristics of the age, which have already been noted. The release of Satan marks a turning point in the Millennium. Satan will quickly exploit, consolidate, and organize any disaffection present on the part of those confirmed in their unbelief. They will likely view him as some sort of deliverer (“messiah”). How long it will take this rebellion to become organized and sufficiently confident to proceed is not certain; it could be a matter of months, or years. The immediate effects of Satan’s release on the millennial environment is not stated in Scripture; but it would seem likely that as the rebellion grows, conditions within the Millennium will be affected, at least at the spiritual, social, and political levels. The rebellion will ultimately turn to overt conflict. Scripture seems to present the rebellious as vastly outnumbering the saints. John relates this prophetic picture:
[Rev. 20:7-9] “When the thousand years are over, Satan will be released from his prison and will go out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the earth–Gog and Magog–to gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the seashore. They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded the camp of God’s people, the city he loves. But fire came down from heaven and devoured them.”
The
Millennium is but the first phase of the visible kingdom of God on earth. The
Abrahamic Covenant, along with the Palestinian, Davidic, and New Covenants
provide the biblical framework for our concept of the visible kingdom of God.
Although Israel has been unfaithful, their unfaithfulness has not, indeed
cannot, invalidate the promises God has made. God has sworn, and will bring his
promises to pass. There is an elect generation, known to God, who will, by
faith, enter into the blessings of the covenant that their ancestors have
forsaken. It is to that generation, as well as the righteous dead of Israel who
will be raised, that God will fulfill his promise of an eternal kingdom–of
which the Millennium is but the beginning of a very long story!
![]()